Yesterday saw a grave crime committed against the rights of God over the lives of His subjects. It seems that the death toll of the man who both bombed a government building in Oslo, and shot over eighty teenagers to death on an island, will bring the complete number of dead to over ninety and counting. There is outrage at the man who could laugh as he shot to death his victims, but it remains to be seen how this episode will be spun by the ever-liberal media so as to make it serve their interests in the deconstruction of the West.
The name of the man who caused such havoc is Anders Behring Breivik-if others are not found to be involved as well. His writings are even now being combed for clues as to why he was involved in such a series of acts, but it seems that two quite different portraits of the man are being painted as a result. Firstly, there is a good deal supposedly written by him against the current invasion of Islam in Europe. There is the call for a return to the roots of Europe in terms that are heavily borrowing from the Crusades. There is a call for the re-founding of the Knights Templar in order to defend Europe from the Moslem horde. There is the recognition of the evil that is threatening Europe by the massive settlements of the infidel. There is the claim that he is a Christian, and therefore that Christianity plays a part in the jihad against the innocent Mideasterners. It is quite a reversal from the normal story of the innocent being slain by Moslem savages. There are pages and pages in which there is call for a Liberation Day in Europe from the Moslems on the 11th or 12th of September, a recollection of the efforts of the Christians fighting the infidel before the gates of Vienna. There is so much material to be used by the media- to be used to crush whatever resistance there is in the West to the poor Moslems and to further put pressure on the Church.
However, there is another side to things. This same man who is supposedly the Christian Crusader is at the same time a Freemason, and in the photo above, he wears the apron of the Order- hardly a badge of the Crusade nor of the Church that waged war valiantly against the infidel. It is Freemasonry that has led the West into its present apostasy; it is Freemasonry that has been at the root of secularist wars against what was left of Catholic Christendom in Mexico, South America, or Europe. This is hardly a force to rise to the defense of the West or Christian tradition.
Further, the entire teaching of the Church rebels at such an act as his. There is no just war if there are no leaders that can claim obedience from those fighting on their behalf- not to mention the fact that one does not just go randomly killing non-combatants. This appears to be a case of vigilantism, and that is far from the crusading spirit. Certainly, there is supposedly the desire to unite the "far right" groups in such a crusade. Yet how can that be taken seriously when this attack could produce nothing else except governments clamping down further on anything that they might consider "hate crimes"? Why will the nationalists groups benefit in his mind when his actions could never bring anything but grief to nationalists groups? He surely knew that his actions alone could not free the West. Did he really think there would be a new crusade after such actions? Or rather, did he have something else in mind?
If this was the first shot in a war against the Islamic invader, then why was there not a drop of Moslem blood shed? Why was not a mosque the target of his bombing? Why are the only victims the very westerners that he claims to rally rather than his self-confessed enemies? For someone who so desired the expulsion of the Mid-easterner, it is odd that none of them actually died. It is very strange.
Again we see the photo of this man dressed in the apron of the Lodge and wonder: is he merely insane, or is he the perfect instrument of the Craft so as to be able to crush what resistance still exists to the fall of the Christian West, all the while playing on the hysteria of nations that already have begun to turn against the Church in a serious way? Will this not be a very convenient case to be brought to the attention of those who feel uncomfortable at the annihilation of Europe at the hands of Islam? Will any resistance now be labeled "fanatical" or even worse, "terrorism"? No, this poor fellow is not another Saint Louis or Richard the Lion-Hearted. The Temple he represents is rather that of Osiris and the Craft. It is Masonry far more that the Catholic West that will benefit from the death of the Norwegians.
No comments:
Post a Comment